Skip to main content

Why Do We Do It?

 


I try not to read the horrible things people post online about the “Old Teachers,” but I looked at a former coworker’s FB site and saw that a local woman had told her to “JUST STOP INTERFERING!” The term "Old Teachers" is thrown around at board meetings as if we were standing in the way of progress brandishing rulers and threatening detention. At one meeting, Mr. Palmer announced that he has "lost all respect for the Old Teachers." (I try not to snicker. Really, I do.)

Look at us. We sit quietly at board meetings. We listen. Often we disagree with The Four, and when we do, we provide our views, sometimes live, sometimes in the newspaper or in places like this blog. People can listen or read and either agree or disagree. That's called free speech, and I'm pretty sure it's in the Bill of Rights. Mr. Abshagen would be happy to explain it.

The Old Teachers are old. The library chairs are hard. We hate driving when it’s dark. Most of us don’t have grandchildren in the Onaway system. The bullies have no filters and no decency. We've been called “satanic,” “liars,” “senile,” and much worse. We could be spending time with our grandchildren. We could be watching *Jeopardy.* At least one of us should be finishing her next book. We could leave the battle for the school to current parents and staff. So why do we stick our noses in and take the abuse?

I heard a line in a detective show recently that struck me as appropriate. Someone asked a rather free-thinking doctor why he'd come back to live in his home town, which was quite conservative, after being out in the wide world. He replied: “This seems like a good place to make a difference, and it’s my home.”

 The Onaway School is home. Onaway is home. It’s a good school and a good town. It’s worth fighting for, even after we Old Teachers thought our battles for proper behavior and high standards were done.

 


Popular posts from this blog

Shooting Down the Rumors

  I was talking with someone yesterday who spoke of “stories” as the best way to convince people to believe a certain way. We can provide facts, numbers, graphs, testimony, whatever, but people who know nothing about a subject except a story they heard will often reject the truth and cling to the narrative. As a former English teacher, I understand the power of the story to hold the listener's heart, even when the story’s proven wrong. Stories are fun to tell and way more exciting than, “I mowed the lawn yesterday.” When people pass shocking tales along, their listeners react with wide eyes and surprised exclamations. For some folks, “I heard that—” seems to excuse the most malicious gossip, no matter how outlandish it might be. An engaging story beats court documents, police reports, and scholarly research, because those things lack the story-telling spirit we enjoy. I love stories. I read stories. I write stories. But I also understand that we need to apply logic to the stori

What Is Education?

  I once had a student chastise me—gently, but sincerely—for telling my class that Richard the Lionheart might have been homosexual. It isn’t a big deal, except it’s one explanation for why he left no heirs, despite having a lovely bride. It meant we got his half-crazed brother John as king when Richard died. Hence the Magna Carta. The student stayed after class to share her opinion that kids (in this case 10 th graders) should only be told “good things” about famous people. History should be uplifting, she maintained, showing us how to be the best we can be. Knowing that came straight from her father’s mouth, I didn’t argue, but thanked her for her input. Too many are sliding into that mindset these days. According to some, it’s bad to admit that our country has faults. It makes students feel “ashamed” of their race and their heritage. I have issues with that mindset. First, truth is truth , no matter how much we might dislike it. I admired Bill Clinton as a President, but wh

Policy Committee Meeting 9/20/23

 I sat through two-thirds of the policy committee's meeting on Wednesday, and here's what I took away. They had asked the school's law firm to send an attorney to answer questions. The man was polite and helpful, despite long, circular discussions that went on and on. He told the board some things that should clear up controversies that should never have happened. *They cannot go into classrooms and look at teachers' grade books. That information is available in other places, so they don't even need to. *They cannot wander the school halls looking for violations of the handbook. They should not consider themselves one-person investigators of any situation. *They should not take parent/citizen complaints that have not already been made to involved staff. Chain of command is important and works efficiently in most cases. *They can name a school board member to hiring committees. I'm thinking that question came in reaction to the football coaching job. *They can as