Skip to main content

Outfoxing the Influencers

 


I used to start every year of 10th grade English with a unit on advertising, as a way to teach kids to think about persuasion. While we’re all aware of ads, we often don’t stop to think about how they convince us to buy a product. What we looked at back then could be useful now, in this time of confusion about what is true and what isn’t.

When someone makes an argument, for a cause or an idea, ask yourself:

1.      What is being “sold”? In advertising, that’s easy, but in other areas, it’s more difficult to see what you’re being offered. Solutions to a problem? A person or platform to vote for/support? Just as you have to decide whether you really need butt deodorant, you also should think about what politicians, from national to local, are trying to sell you. Right now, in many cases, it’s fear: fear of the unknown, fear of the future, fear of those who are different.

2.     Who is making the claim? Knowing a person’s goals and motivation helps us understand why they say what they do. Recognizing that no one is right about everything is essential to looking past the sales pitch to find the truth. Your mother, bless her, was wrong about some things. Your pastor, as earnest as he might be, is wrong sometimes too. Even your English teacher from tenth grade can be wrong. Who knew the Oxford Dictionary would ever tell you that alright is “acceptable English”! But I digress. The point is that we need to take into account who is presenting an argument.

3.     How do they approach “selling” you an idea? Politicians who are in office like to report all the good they’ve accomplished, while they hide their failures as best they can. Those who aren’t in power do the opposite, predicting disaster if we don’t change course soon. It’s interesting how they do the same things on the opposite side when the power structure reverses. Interesting, but not helpful in terms of finding truth.

4.     Why are they trying to “sell” you? That’s the biggest question, and often the hardest to answer. Too many times, it boils down to power. The older I get, the more I believe that trouble arises from people either wanting to get power or fighting to keep it. They want the power to tell others what to do. The power to keep certain people down. The power to have what you have. (Along with that comes jealousy, but that’s a post for another time.)

As citizens, our greatest defense against tyrants is truth. Demand it. Look for it within the storm of words we’re battered with every day. Seek it out by reading and listening and–most of all--thinking. Ask yourself those questions: What is being sold? Who is selling it? How do they frame their argument? Why do they want this?

It’s a complicated world, but if we pay attention, there are places where reasonable people can agree on a main idea and then discuss/negotiate the details. We don’t have to destroy what we have that’s good in order to consider and even accommodate a range of ideas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Old Teachers

 At Tuesday night’s board meeting, a comment was made by a board member that upset me. I don’t have it verbatim, but it was something like this: Old teachers shouldn’t be allowed to attend these meetings. Let me tell you about old teachers. They’re educated . In order to become teachers, they had to leave Onaway and see a bit of the outside world. They read . And they know how to read between the lines and figure out what someone isn’t saying; what they really mean. They care. After twenty, thirty, sometimes more years in the school system, they care about it. They know how the system works, and they know its flaws. One of the biggest problems a school can face is a board member (or four) with an agenda. Work on everything else tends to stop while this person (these people) rant about their favorite subjects, which are either wrong or don’t focus on real goals for improvement and advancement of all students. They know people . Like many former teachers, I taught every student

What Is Education?

  I once had a student chastise me—gently, but sincerely—for telling my class that Richard the Lionheart might have been homosexual. It isn’t a big deal, except it’s one explanation for why he left no heirs, despite having a lovely bride. It meant we got his half-crazed brother John as king when Richard died. Hence the Magna Carta. The student stayed after class to share her opinion that kids (in this case 10 th graders) should only be told “good things” about famous people. History should be uplifting, she maintained, showing us how to be the best we can be. Knowing that came straight from her father’s mouth, I didn’t argue, but thanked her for her input. Too many are sliding into that mindset these days. According to some, it’s bad to admit that our country has faults. It makes students feel “ashamed” of their race and their heritage. I have issues with that mindset. First, truth is truth , no matter how much we might dislike it. I admired Bill Clinton as a President, but wh

Shooting Down the Rumors

  I was talking with someone yesterday who spoke of “stories” as the best way to convince people to believe a certain way. We can provide facts, numbers, graphs, testimony, whatever, but people who know nothing about a subject except a story they heard will often reject the truth and cling to the narrative. As a former English teacher, I understand the power of the story to hold the listener's heart, even when the story’s proven wrong. Stories are fun to tell and way more exciting than, “I moved the lawn yesterday.” When people pass shocking tales along, their listeners react with wide eyes and surprised exclamations. For some folks, “I heard that—” seems to excuse the most malicious gossip, no matter how outlandish it might be. An engaging story beats court documents, police reports, and scholarly research, because those things lack the story-telling spirit we enjoy. I love stories. I read stories. I write stories. But I also understand that we need to apply logic to the stori